55 FTEs across two shared service centres (Cape Town + Vilnius)
| Function | FTE | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AP — Freight | 12 | Manual 3-way match, LogisTrak ERP |
| AP — Contract Logistics | 3 | Manual processing, PDF invoices |
| AR — Cash Application | 4 | InvoiceIQ automation (partial) |
| AR — Collections | 15 | 2,600 open invoices |
| Netting / Intercompany | 8 | Global coverage |
| Financial Control | 2 | Month-end close support |
| General Ledger | 3 | Meridian reconciliations |
| WW Finance Offshoring | 7 | Regional support functions |
| T&E Processing | 1 | 6 entities, 3 continents, zero backup — 2.0 FTE gap |
| TOTAL | 55 |
NACOR was added to GBS T&E processing without governance approval, business case, or headcount adjustment
280,000 invoices per year processed entirely by hand — at more than 3x the cost of automated peers
No scope review process for GBS additions. NACOR added informally, bypassing GBS Director.
PROCESS92% of NACOR claims require manual intervention. Bookings outside approved channels, missing receipts. No capacity to reject or enforce — non-compliant spend is rubber-stamped because the alternative is a processing meltdown.
COMPLIANCE280K invoices processed by hand annually. No OCR, no auto-matching, no auto-posting. InvoiceIQ and LogisTrak automation licensed but not configured.
TECHNOLOGYInvoiceIQ, LogisTrak auto-matching, and Meridian expense module all have automation capabilities that remain inactive.
TECHNOLOGY1 person at 300% capacity, zero backup. Leave or resignation halts T&E for 6 entities across 3 continents. Non-compliant claims are processed unchallenged — the operator has no capacity to enforce policy, creating unrecoverable spend losses.
4.2% error rate on 280K invoices = 11,760 errors/year. Manual processes lack audit trail for SOX compliance.
NACOR assigned outside governance. Sets precedent for uncontrolled scope additions to GBS without review.
8.5% late payment rate erodes carrier relationships. In freight forwarding, carrier goodwill directly impacts rate negotiations and capacity allocation.
Against industry median and top-quartile peers
| Action | Owner | Timeline | Expected Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formalize NACOR scope | GBS Director | Week 1 | Governance compliance |
| Approve 2 T&E FTEs | CFO | Week 1 | Close 2.0 FTE gap — processing + compliance |
| InvoiceIQ deployment | GBS Director + IT | Day 1–60 | AP automation foundation |
| OCR + auto-matching activation | IT + Finance Control | Day 30–60 | 65% STP target |
| T&E compliance directive | CFO → US leadership | Day 14 | Reduce 92% query rate |
| AP SLA and charge-back model | GBS Director + CFO | Day 60–90 | Cost transparency |
| T&E governance precedent | GBS Review Board | Day 90 | Prevent future scope creep |
| Meridian expense module activation | GBS Director + IT | Day 60–90 | T&E auto-reject/routing |
“Approve T&E headcount and governance, deploy AP automation using tools already licensed”
Click a slide to jump to it, or press Esc to close